Legal Opinion
MacAulay-brown, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 18, 2016No. 15-1041CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FIRESTONE, Senior Judge.
OPINION
Pending before the court in this bid protest challenging proposed corrective action are cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed by plaintiff MacAu-lay-Brown, Inc. (“MacAulay-Brown”), plaintiff-intervenors CACI-WGI, Inc. (“CACI”) and Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (“Booz Allen”), defendant the United States (“the government”), and defendant-intervenor Jacobs Technology, Inc. (“Jacobs”). The plaintiffs were awarded contracts by the United States Special Operations Command (“SOCOM” or “the agency”). In response to protests be fore the U.S.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Professional Service Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Automated Collection Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Fms Investment Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Mayvin, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.