Legal Opinion
Therm-O-Disc, Inc. v. Maatuk
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 1, 2003No. 03-1385PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Therm-O-Disc, Inc. (TOD) moves to dismiss Josef Maatuk’s appeal, which the court treats as a motion for summary affirmance. Maatuk has not responded to the motion. Maatuk moves for an extension of time to file his brief. TOD opposes.
On October 9, 2002, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio entered judgment for TOD. Maatuk timely filed a Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4) post-judgment motion for relief from the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). On November 26, 2002, the district court denied Maatuk’s Rule 60(b) motion. Maatuk did not appeal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Durango Associates, Inc., and Dnd Corporation v. Reflange, Inc., and Climax Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maatuk v. Emerson Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019