Legal Opinion
Maatuk v. Emerson Electric, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 14, 2019No. 19-1615Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JOSEF MAATUK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. EMERSON ELECTRIC, INC., BERND ZIMMERMAN, PRASAD KHADKIKAR, DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants THERM-O-DISC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1615 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 1:16-cv-03023-TMP, Mag- istrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. ______________________ Decided: August 14, 2019 ______________________ JOSEF MAATUK, Los Angeles, CA, pro se. DAVID…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., and Novopharm, Inc. And Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Jack A. Ekchian v. The Home Depot, Inc., MacKlanburg Company, Mti Corporation and Zircon Corporation, and Lucas Automation & Control Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corp. v. CTS Cement Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.