Legal Opinion

Mendenhall v. Holtzclaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1944No. 14876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first special ground of the motion for new trial complains because the judge instructed the jury: “In the record there is a deed dated the 12th day of December, 1931, from Lillian D. Finn to J. G. Holtzclaw, which deed has on it what is called an endorsement or quitclaim provision, or release provision, signed by Emory University to Lillian D. Finn, releasing the property described in the deed from any interest that Emory University might have in it as a result of any outstanding lien that it had upon this and other property. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collinsville Granite Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Simpson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Keith v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Grant v. HaymesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Archer v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. SpillersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API