Legal Opinion
Grant v. Haymes
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 22, 1927No. 5756PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
H. W. Grant, the husband of plaintiff, on January 23, 1909, contracted to sell to N. B. Haymes a described tract of land, and executed and delivered to him on said date his bond for title thereto, which contains this provision: “There is a sand bank on the property to be conveyed, said sand bank being on the west side of the road extending from Chattanooga to Blowing Springs, and the right is reserved to remove all of the said sand in said bank up to the north boundary line of the property to be conveyed, and as far west as sand may extend, together with…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Marvin v. . Brewster Iron Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- McRae v. Stillwell, Millen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Morgan v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. FenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Brooke v. DellingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Hodges v. Georgia Kaolin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Imerys Marble Co. v. J.M. Huber Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.