Legal Opinion

Morales v. Riley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring, in effect, that the defendant does not have a prescriptive easement over any portion of the plaintiffs’ property and to recover damages for trespass, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.H.O.), entered December 23, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of them and against the defendant in the sum of only $1,000, and is in favor of the defendant and against them on the counterclaim for a judgment declaring that the defendant has a prescriptive easement over a portion of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. De Camp v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Rothstone v. NortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Litwin v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Sakele Bros. v. SafdieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Masucci v. DeLucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. D'Argenio v. Ashland Building, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Oppedisano v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Daniello v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API