Legal Opinion
Rothstone v. Norton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 5, 1930PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
The temporary administrators of Arnold Rothstein, deceased, brought suit against the Farmers and Traders Life Insurance Company upon its life insurance policy in the sum of $20,000, issued on his life and payable to his estate in the event of death. The insurance company had originally refused to pay upon demand of the temporary administrators and the filing of proof of death.
The insurance company thereafter appeared in the action and moved for an order of interpleader substituting the defendant, appellant, herein, Inez Norton, as defendant in its stead. The insurance company showed that she…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Greenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Submission of Controversy under Sections 546 & 547 of the Civil Practice Act between Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Estate of PastoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Prudential Ins. Co. Of America v. GlasgowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. v. City Nat. Bank of FairmontDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.