Legal Opinion

Masucci v. DeLuca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2012PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs own real property adjacent to the defendants’ property in Staten Island. In 2007, the plaintiffs commenced this action seeking, inter alia, to recover damages for trespass due to the defendants’ installation of an underground pipe in the area between the plaintiffs’ tennis court fence and the defendants’ retaining wall (hereinafter the disputed area). The defendants interposed various counterclaims, alleging, inter alia, that they were entitled to a judgment declaring that they have a prescriptive easement with respect to the disputed area.

The defendants moved for summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Mandia v. King Lumber & Plywood Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Bloomingdales, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Gorman v. HessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Morales v. RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Panday v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Curanovic v. CordoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Colin Realty Co., LLC v. Manhasset Pizza, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Aboulissan v. Kingsland 79, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Carty v. GoodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API