Legal Opinion

Bundrant v. Rikal

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County

Decided June 8, 1961No. 117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Shumaker, P. J.,

This matter is before the court on an appeal from an opinion and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The facts are not in dispute, and the findings of fact made by the referee and the board are not here questioned by counsel.

Victor Rikal was-engaged in the trucking business and took out a workmen’s compensation policy issued by the General Accident Group in the name of Victor P. Rikal, trading and doing business as Vic Rikal Trucking, effective December 1, 1958, to December 1, 1959.

During October of 1958, said Victor Rikal bought the Royal Taxi Service, then insured in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. MossMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hatter v. LenoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API