Legal Opinion

Hatter v. Lenox

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 657PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal by Dr. Stephen D. Carmick, the defendant-appellant, from the order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 3 of Philadelphia County reversing the Workmen’s Compensation Board and holding the defendant-appellant to be jointly liable for compensation benefits to the claimant Mabel Hatter, with Dr. Richard E. Lenox, the other defendant.

The claimant filed a petition for compensation for a back injury as the result of a fall in the course of her employment on June 28, 1962. The defendant Dr. Lenox answered that at the time of the accident she was in the concurrent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Saltillo Bor. Coun. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Bundrant v. RIKALSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Bundrant v. Rikal, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County1961
  4. Carlson v. Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Eppley v. Eldora Land Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Road Lines v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (ROYAL)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Franklin Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. City of Monessen v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Dixon v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Dixon v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API