Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Moss

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1945No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 42,912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

By a bill in chancery plaintiff seeks cancellation of a compensation insurance policy issued to defendant Moss, and thereby to save itself from possible liability incident to an accidental injury suffered by Prank Aldrich who was an employee of Moss. The defendants other than Moss filed a disclaimer and therefore are not concerned in the outcome of this litigation. Defendant Moss filed a cross bill and seeks to have plaintiff insurance company decreed liable as his insurer for com-' pensation awarded to his employees. The relief sought by plaintiff was decreed. Earle R. Moss, designated as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gratopp v. Carde Stamping & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Zielke v. A. J. Marshall Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Michigan Workers' Compensation Insurance Agency v. Ace American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Bundrant v. Rikal, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County1961
  3. Burhans v. Central States Produce Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Koch v. Boalsburg Water Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API