Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1969No. 191PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

On this appeal, the plaintiff makes three assertions:

1. The trial court erred in disregarding the law of the case, as set forth in this court’s opinion on rehearing, by refusing to consider the facts stated in the demand for admission of facts.

2. The property division of 10 percent of the trust assets and income to the plaintiff and 90 percent to the defendant constituted an abuse of discretion by the trial court.

3. Plaintiff is entitled to additional attorney’s fees under the facts of this case.

Demand for admission of facts.

The plaintiff contends that in making the division of the property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Spheeris v. SpheerisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wahl v. WahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Strandberg v. StrandbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Polleck v. PolleckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. O'Connor v. O'ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hennen v. HennenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Martin v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Markham v. MarkhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API