Arbeiter v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Movant, Joseph F. Arbeiter, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced as a persistent offender to two consecutive sentences of ten years each. This court affirmed movant’s conviction on direct appeal. State v. Arbeiter, 664 S.W.2d 566 (Mo.App.1983).
Movant then filed a Rule 27.26 motion. Counsel was appointed and the motion was amended. The trial court denied movant an evidentiary hearing and dismissed his amended motion. Movant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ArbeiterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Seltzer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Medley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. ArbeiterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. ArbeiterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Stuckey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. OlneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Christopher Michael King v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.