Legal Opinion

Medley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1982No. 45068PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Movant, Seibert Ray Medley, appeals from a judgment, entered without an evi-dentiary hearing, which denied, in part, his Rule 27.26 motion. The trial court vacated movant’s armed criminal action conviction but denied the rest of the motion. We affirm.

On February 15, 1977, movant was charged with robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. The evidence adduced at trial showed that there had been a robbery of a drug store in the City of St. Louis. Movant was identified by three witnesses as having committed that robbery.

On March 22, 1978, the jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Sours v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State v. MedleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bannister v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Guinan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Newman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Frazier v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API