Legal Opinion

Krisor v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 2013No. 090185CV; A146782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Plaintiff challenged the Lake County Fair Board’s decision to hire a man named Dwayne Haffner for a position as a maintenance technician because, according to plaintiff, the decision occurred at a meeting held in violation of Oregon’s public meetings laws. ORS 192.610 - 192.690. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff filed the action after the 60-day statute of limitations had run. ORS 192.680(5). Because we conclude that the action was moot at the time of trial, we dismiss the appeal without reaching the statute of limitations issue.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Keeney v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nordbye v. BRCP/GM EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Krisor v. Lake County Fair BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Hooper v. Division of Medical Assistance ProgramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Wood v. Wasco Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API