Legal Opinion

Christopher Covey v. Assessor of Ohio County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2015No. 13-1227PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge THACKER joined.

FLOYD, Circuit Judge:

As the Supreme Court recently reaffirmed, the Fourth Amendment protects both homes and the “land immediately surrounding and associated” with homes, known as curtilage, from unreasonable government intrusions. Florida v. Jardines, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1409, 1414, 185 L.Ed.2d 495 (2013). In this civil suit, Cristopher and Lela Covey allege that several government officials violated their Fourth Amendment rights by entering curtilage — here, a walk-out…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Charles Byrd v. Phoenix Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Cary King v. Louisiana Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. French v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. Wootten v. VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. United States v. CarlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API