Christopher Covey v. Assessor of Ohio County
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge THACKER joined.
FLOYD, Circuit Judge:
As the Supreme Court recently reaffirmed, the Fourth Amendment protects both homes and the “land immediately surrounding and associated” with homes, known as curtilage, from unreasonable government intrusions. Florida v. Jardines, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1409, 1414, 185 L.Ed.2d 495 (2013). In this civil suit, Cristopher and Lela Covey allege that several government officials violated their Fourth Amendment rights by entering curtilage — here, a walk-out…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Charles Byrd v. Phoenix Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cary King v. Louisiana Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- French v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Wootten v. VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
- United States v. CarlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.