Legal Opinion

Friedlmeier v. Altman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1989No. 884SC797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erroneously categorized their action as being based on the promissory note, rather than as an action for breach of the settlement agreement, fraud, and declaration of a constructive trust. At the outset we emphasize, however, that defendant Altman satisfied his obligations under the land sale portion of the settlement agreement when the parties closed the transaction on 21 December 1985; he paid plaintiffs $225,000 in cash and his corporation executed a promissory note for the remaining $330,000. Thereafter the parties’ rights and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Childers v. Parker's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Burnette Industries, Inc. v. Danbar of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green Park Inn, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Slate v. MarionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Brumley v. Mallard, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API