Legal Opinion

Richard v. Tarpon Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1972No. 3983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

This action was instituted by Herbert Richard to cancel an oil, gas and mineral lease on the ground that the lessees had not drilled or paid an annual delay rental within the time specified in the lease. The suit was instituted originally against a number of parties, but it was settled as to some of them, leaving five defendants remaining. One of the remaining defendants is Tarpon Oil Company, the owner of an interest in the lease. A third party demand filed by one of the other remaining defendants was severed from the principal suit by agreement of the parties, and it is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. LasterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Jones v. Southern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Le Rosen v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Calhoun v. Gulf Refining CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sketoe v. Exxon Company, USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Alice Shilling Lapeze, and Hiram Shilling, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Richard v. Tarpon Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Sketoe v. Exxon Company, USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API