Watertown Milk Producers Co-operative Ass'n v. Van Camp Packing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1OpinionOwen, J.
(On motion for rehearing.) On the brief in support of a motion for rehearing the able attorney for the respondent assumes that the court did not understand his position and argument, that being the only reason he can assign for the conclusion of the court. A reconsideration of the case reassures us that we perfectly understood him, and as we can account for his brief on no other theory than that he misunderstood us, the situation justifies a patient effort to greater clarity.
Counsel impugns the opinion as unsound and inadequate. Our conviction of its soundness is strengthened by the review…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. P. Lorillard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Sill v. SillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Stephens v. WheelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Colwell Lead Co. v. Home Title InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Broughton v. Louisville & Nashville RairoadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926