Legal Opinion

State v. Sweat

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2014No. 88663-6PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 Under RCW 9.94A.535(3)(h)(i), a court may impose an exceptional sentence for someone who has exhibited an ongoing pattern of domestic violence. Richard Sweat received such a sentence as part of his latest domestic violence conviction. He believes the trial court erred and argues that the catchall definition of “victim” in RCW 9.94A-.030 must be used in interpreting RCW 9.94A.535(3)(h)(i), precluding the application of the aggravating factor when the pattern of abuse was not perpetrated against the victim or victims of the currently charged offense. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

¶2…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. State v. JardinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. DerenoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. KozeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. Amjad PervezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API