Legal Opinion

Green v. Lybrand

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1978No. 7812DC72PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff urges that the proceedings should not have been dismissed because he was not seeking repossession of the *58premises solely on the basis of nonpayment of rent. Plaintiffs complaint is set out in essence as follows:

First Claim for Relief: The lease provided that the rent was payable in advance on or before the first day of each month; the rent for the third month was not paid by the seventh of the month; the October rent check was tendered on the 12th of the month; and on 16 October “the plaintiff . . . notified the defendant . . . that the defendant’s lease was terminated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoover v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ryan v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Morris v. AustrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. McMichael v. Borough Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Seligson v. . KlymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Menache v. Atlantic Coast Management Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API