Green v. Lybrand
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff urges that the proceedings should not have been dismissed because he was not seeking repossession of the *58premises solely on the basis of nonpayment of rent. Plaintiffs complaint is set out in essence as follows:
First Claim for Relief: The lease provided that the rent was payable in advance on or before the first day of each month; the rent for the third month was not paid by the seventh of the month; the October rent check was tendered on the 12th of the month; and on 16 October “the plaintiff . . . notified the defendant . . . that the defendant’s lease was terminated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoover v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Ryan v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Morris v. AustrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- McMichael v. Borough Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Seligson v. . KlymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Menache v. Atlantic Coast Management Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979