Legal Opinion

Morris v. Austraw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1967No. 120PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

Defendants assign as errors each of Judge Martin’s two conclusions of law, each of the three matters adjudged and decreed in the judgment, and the entry of the judgment.

The written lease between the parties referred to in the first paragraph of the stipulated and agreed facts is set forth in fourteen pages in the record. The basis and scope of summary ejectment in actions between the landlord and tenant are established by G.S. 42-26. Defendants’ brief states that the first question involved. is: “Did Richard F. Austraw’s violation of 21 U.S.C. 331 and 333 constitute a forfeiture of all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Howell v. . BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Dees v. . AppleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chrisalis Properties, Inc. v. Separate Quarters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Stanley v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Charlotte Housing Authority v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Chandler v. CLEVELAND SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Creech v. Ranmar PropertiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API