Legal Opinion
Converse v. Vizio, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 13, 2020No. 3:17-cv-05897Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 AMY CONVERSE, on her own behalf CASE NO. C17-5897 BHS 8 and on behalf of others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 9 MOTION FOR CLASS Plaintiff, CERTIFICATION 10 v. 11 VIZIO, INC. a California corporation, 12 Defendant. 13 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Amy Converse’s (“Converse”) 14 motion for class certification. Dkt. 67. The Court has considered the pleadings filed in 15 support of and in opposition to the motion and the remainder of the file and hereby denies 16 the motion for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Wolin v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.