Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge.
This order addresses plaintiffs motion for sanctions for spoliation of evidence [docket # 127] and defendant’s first motion in limine [docket # 128]. The Court has considered the motions, responses and replies.
Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence by Plaintiff
Facts1
A developmental^ disabled employee (“Mr. Stringer”) of King Soopers was discharged in June of 2006. Amended Complaint at 11, 24. Plaintiff alleges it was for discriminatory reasons under the Americans with Disabilities Act; defendant contends it was based on a violation of company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Turner v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dillon Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Meyer v. Core CivicDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022