Legal Opinion

Truslow v. Woodruff

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1967No. Civ. 30660, 30933PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

The record before us is the most verbose and futile we have yet had the misfortune to dissect. It comprises four complaints, the original and three amended, answers and counterclaims, numerous affidavits and declarations in support of a number of repetitive and prolix motions. The motions embrace requests for reconsideration of rulings, summary judgment, judgment on the pleadings, early settings, protective orders, contempt, to expunge an order, leave to file amendments, leave to renew, for a new trial and to reopen. No pleading was filed in respect of which there was not a demurrer or a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ferrell v. Southern Nevada Off-Road Enthusiasts, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API