Legal Opinion

Sanders v. E-Z Park, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1960No. 35449PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is a stockholders’ derivative action against the corporate officers and directors of the Pigeon Hole Parking, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Pigeon Hole), seeking rescission of its purchase of all the assets of the E-Z Park, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as E-Z Park). The leading spirits in this litigation are the brothers Sanders— Leo heading the dissident minority stockholder group of Pigeon Hole and Vaughn representing the majority stockholders.

Prior to 1950, the Sanders brothers invented and patented a device for the mechanical parking of automobiles. They proceeded to incorporate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. CastletonWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tefft v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nursing Home Building Corp. v. DeHartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Schwarzmann v. Ass'n of Apartment OwnersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Poweroil Manufacturing Co. v. CarstensenWashington Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API