Waldron v. City of Snohomish
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior eouxt for Snohomish. county, Denney, J., entered January 7, 1905, in favor of the relator, granting a writ of mandamus to compel the levy of a municipal reassessment for a local improvement.
1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.
Relator instituted this proceeding to compel the city of Snohomish to make a reassessment, in order to pay certain special fund warrants held by him. From a judgment and decree directing such reassessment, this appeal is taken.
Appellants filed a motion to quash the writ, and later, a demurrer to the writ and application, said motion and de* murrer being denied and overruled. Thereupon appellants made answer, presenting the following defenses: (1) Plea in abatement, alleging that the terms of office of G. L. Turner, as mayor, and F. S. Anderson'and W. O. Dolsen, as councilmen, had expired, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frederick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Hemen v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Abernethy v. Town of Medical LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Wasmund v. HarmWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Cline v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Shaw & Hodgins v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.