Arrow Holding Corp. v. McLaughlin's Sons
New York Supreme Court
Action to compel specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
This is an action to compel specific performance by a vendor of an agreement to convey certain property. Plaintiff is the assignee of the vendee, and had by an' appropriate instrument assumed all the latter’s obligations under the agreement of sale. It is not claimed that the vendor (defendant) assented either to the assignment or to the assumption of the vendee’s obligation. On the other hand, there is no question but that the assignee has> tendered and is able to make full performance of the vendee’s obligation. The defendant’s first and main point is one of law, to the effect that “ in no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Groesbeck v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Ide v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michaels v. FlapanNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Windsor Investing Corp. v. T. J. McLaughlin's SonsNew York Supreme Court · 1927