Legal Opinion
Bromer v. Rosensweig
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 1, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered June 28, 1994 (Sue Ann Hoahng, J.) reversed, without costs, the holdover petition is reinstated, and the matter is remanded to the Civil Court for further proceedings.
Appeal from order entered October 25, 1994 (Sue Ann Hoahng, J.) denying reargument, dismissed without costs as nonappealable (Oppenheimer & Co. v Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 173 AD2d 203).
Landlord commenced holdover licensee proceedings against respondent upon the death of the rent-controlled statutory tenant. As yet, no answer has been served herein, but it appears that respondent will be…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sohn v. CalderonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- 829 Seventh Avenue Co. v. ReiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Schneyer v. SilbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Golden Mountain Realty Inc. v. SeverinoCivil Court of the City of New York · 2012
- Golden Mountain Realty Inc. v. SeverinoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013
- PACT Renaissance Collaborative LLC v. Crespo, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2025