Legal Opinion

Norstadt v. Murphy Plywood/Liberty Northwest Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1997No. 94-10782, 94-10781, 94-10773, 94-10774, 94-05124; CA A93457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that his bilateral hearing loss is compensable but that the loss is not the responsibility of any of the employers joined in this proceeding.1 We reverse and remand.

Claimant has had multiple employers over the years, most of whom were in the forest products industry. Claimant worked for Huffman & Wright cutting lumber from December 1985 to January 1986. Claimant first sought treatment for his compensable hearing loss in October 1986, while he was working for Douglas County Forest Products (DCFP), then insured by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Timm v. MaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. MOTEL 6 v. McMastersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norstadt v. MURPHY PLYWOOD/LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API