Legal Opinion

MOTEL 6 v. McMasters

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 1995No. WCB 92-09365, 92-05850; CA A84163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

CIGNA Insurance Company (CIGNA) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) upholding claimant’s aggravation claim. We affirm.

Claimant worked as a housekeeper for Motel 6 beginning in July 1989. In August 1989, she suffered a compen-sable injury to her right shoulder and low back. The claim was accepted by CIGNA, which was employer’s insurer at the time. It was closed in October 1989 by a notice of closure that awarded claimant temporary disability. Claimant returned to her regular job. She continued to have back pain and the claim was reopened in November 1989. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franzen v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Farmers Insurance Group v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Norstadt v. Murphy Plywood/Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Norstadt v. MURPHY PLYWOOD/LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API