Legal Opinion
People v. Autterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1968No. Crim. 13626PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
A jury found defendant guilty of a violation of section 12420, Penal Code (possession, offering for sale and sale of tear gas). He appeals from the judgment.
About November 20, 1966, there came to the attention of Officer Egger, Beverly Hills Police Department, an advertisement in the Home Section, Los Angeles Times, Sunday Edition, entitled “Defender of Women—It Works.” Under the title' were certain printing and a black and white drawing depicting a hand holding an object pointed toward the face of a person reeling back in apparent pain; it gave a Beverly Hills address. After contacting an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Brown v. State Department of HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. HornerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. BrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. GloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.