People v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCobet, J.
This appeal raises two principal questions. The first is whether a narcotics officer, without giving the warnings and obtaining the waiver required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], may interrogate a tenant of an apartment regarding his use of narcotics and whether any narcotics are then in the apartment at a time when he has probable cause to arrest him for a narcotics violation. We answer this question in the negative. The second question is whether such Miranda error requires reversal under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 [17 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. HerdanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. MunizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- State v. MeansMontana Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.