Legal Opinion

Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1970No. 40108PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Petitioner in this appeal brings an issue he could readily have presented earlier in these proceedings when we decided en banc that the trial court had discretion to appoint counsel for him but not at public expense. See Honore v. State Bd. of Prison Terms & Paroles, 77 Wn.2d *698660, 466 P.2d 485 (1970). The petition now urges a substantive claim that the Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles lost jurisdiction of petitioner when, during his term of imprisonment, it paroled him to the federal courts for trial and imprisonment on a federal indictment.

September 13, 1963, petitioner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In RE MASON v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In RE SCOTT v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In Re CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Joe David Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re RoachWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of RoachWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API