Legal Opinion
Joe David Murray v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1964No. 18959_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
Joe David Murray, a federal prisoner, appeals from a district court order denying, without hearing, his application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Murray alleged in the application that, on November 3, 1955, while he was incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, serving a twenty-year sentence, he was paroled and released by the Government to the authorities of the State of Oklahoma, to begin serving a twenty-five year state sentence. He further alleged that on November 14, 1962, the Government revoked the parole and he is now serving the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bert Strand, Sheriff of San Diego County, State of California v. William SchmittrothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Gould v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- G. W. Stubblefield v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by10 opinions
- Konigsberg v. CicconeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
- Harry Lawrence Barr v. J. J. Parker, Warden, United States PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- United States ex rel. Williams v. FitzpatrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Honore v. STATE BD. OF PRISON TERMSWashington Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.