Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Molko
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 3, 1981No. C-80-0633 TEHPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
HENDERSON, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on motions of Defendants Cooper to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, and on motions of Defendants Cooper, Mabry, and Molko to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for attorney’s fees. For the reasons set out below, all of Defendants’ motions are denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Will Cooper, a member of the Unification Church, brings this suit against his parents, 1 seven alleged “deprogrammers,” 2 and various…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Colombrito v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Thurman v. City of TorringtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Colombrito v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Stevens v. RifkinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.