Legal Opinion

United States v. Banco Internacional/Bital S.A.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 17, 2000No. CV 99-6291 ABC (CWX)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 56.

COLLINS, District Judge.

Defendant’s Motion pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 came on regularly for hearing before this Court on April 17, 2000. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

The Government operated a money laundering “sting,” Operation Casablanca, directed at Mexican banks from approximately October 1996 to April 1998. (Stmnt. of Genuine Issues (“Facts”) ¶ 2.) For this operation,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet Aircraft Displaying Tail Number VPCESDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. United States v. $160,066.98 from Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2001
  4. United States v. LazarenkoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  5. Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API