S & S Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hirschfield
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
A judgment was rendered against the appellants for recovery of a sum of money equal to a brokerage commission, as a result of a purchase in which the appellants either assumed or made a direct promise to pay the amount of the commission upon a release by the broker to the seller and the execution of an indemnification agreement by the appellants to the seller.
They appeal and urge error in the failure to grant a continuance on the morning of the trial. This is a discretionary matter; no abuse of discretion is demonstrated in this record in refusing to continue the trial after it had been set…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Fain v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Meek v. BriggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Freeman v. BandlowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edwards v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Rodriguez v. Allied Universal Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985