Legal Opinion

S & S Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hirschfield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 1969No. 69-169PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A judgment was rendered against the appellants for recovery of a sum of money equal to a brokerage commission, as a result of a purchase in which the appellants either assumed or made a direct promise to pay the amount of the commission upon a release by the broker to the seller and the execution of an indemnification agreement by the appellants to the seller.

They appeal and urge error in the failure to grant a continuance on the morning of the trial. This is a discretionary matter; no abuse of discretion is demonstrated in this record in refusing to continue the trial after it had been set…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Fain v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Meek v. BriggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  5. Freeman v. BandlowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Rodriguez v. Allied Universal Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API