Legal Opinion

Meek v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 29, 1920PublishedCited by 16 opinions

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This, suit was brought to require the specific performance of an alleged contract to sell real estate. The bill of complaint was demurred to on various grounds. Upon a hearing there was an order sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill. From this order an appeal -was taken to this court.

*489The decisive question in the case is whether the alleged contract of -sale or some note or memorandum thereof “in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith,” as required by the statute of frauds, is sufficiently alleged or shown in the bill. Sec. 2517, Gen. Stats. 1906, Compiled Laws, 1914.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
  4. Freeland v. RitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Darling v. Cumming's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Donald White v. Sunoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Webster Lumber Co. v. LincolnSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Socarras v. Claughton Hotels, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Zimmerman v. DiedrichSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API