Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Allied Universal Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 16, 1985No. 85-400Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

After a jury verdict for the plaintiff in a personal injury action, the lower court granted the defendants a new trial on the sole ground that it had erred in denying their motion for continuance on the eve of trial.1 We reverse.

Since the record shows that defense counsel was completely neglectful in its preparation of the case, it is clear that there was no cognizable ground for' the requested continuance and thus that it was properly denied. S & S Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hirschfield, 226 So.2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). It follows that the new trial order, founded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Florida Power Corporation v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Bishop v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Boutwell v. BishopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API