Legal Opinion
Denver & S. L. Ry. Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement Dist.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 20, 1929No. 8859PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Issues.
SYMES, District Judge.
In brief, the allegations of this hill are that on January 6, 1926, plaintiff railroad, and defendant the, Moffat Tunnel Improvement District, acting by and through the commission, entered into a written contract or lease, whereby the district leased to the plaintiff for a term of 50 years the railway use of the Moffat Tunnel and certain other property, with an option to renew for 49 years more; that the rent agreed to he paid is 66% per cent, of the installments of the principal of the Moffat Tunnel bonds of $6,720,000, and so-called Moffat Tunnel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wisehart v. Zions BancorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- City of Austin v. CottenTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. Idlewild Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
- Herman v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Benward v. Automobile Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945