Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Cotten

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1974No. B-4053PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, W. C. Cotten, Jr., a consulting engineer, was employed by the City of Austin to design a street improvement project. Cotten has performed his services and has been paid $37,400 by the City. In this suit, Cotten seeks additional compensation from the City.

When Cotten was first employed to design the project, he and the City entered into a written contract, prepared by Cotten, which provided that Cotten would be paid 8.1% on the total cost to the City of the project, “provided, however, that the total fee shall not exceed” a stated sum.

The ultimate cost…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. United States v. F. C. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Moffat Tunnel Improvement Dist. v. Denver & S. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  5. Joseph F. Hogan v. Wilbur C. Wright, D/B/A Wright Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zieben v. PlattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. S & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Ledig v. Duke Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Plains Cotton Cooperative Ass'n v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Crestview, Ltd. v. Foremost Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API