City of Austin v. Cotten
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GREENHILL, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff, W. C. Cotten, Jr., a consulting engineer, was employed by the City of Austin to design a street improvement project. Cotten has performed his services and has been paid $37,400 by the City. In this suit, Cotten seeks additional compensation from the City.
When Cotten was first employed to design the project, he and the City entered into a written contract, prepared by Cotten, which provided that Cotten would be paid 8.1% on the total cost to the City of the project, “provided, however, that the total fee shall not exceed” a stated sum.
The ultimate cost…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- United States v. F. C. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Moffat Tunnel Improvement Dist. v. Denver & S. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Joseph F. Hogan v. Wilbur C. Wright, D/B/A Wright Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zieben v. PlattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. S & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ledig v. Duke Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Plains Cotton Cooperative Ass'n v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Crestview, Ltd. v. Foremost Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.