Meadowlanes Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'n v. City of Holland
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
Before: Danhof, C.J., and Hood and R. L. Olzark,* JJ. Per Curiam.
Petitioner, Meadowlanes Limited Dividend Housing Association, and respondent, City of Holland, Michigan, both appeal as of right from the Michigan Tax Tribunal’s supplementary judgment rendered on remand from this Court. The Michigan Tax Tribunal denied the parties’ motions to vacate the supplementary judgment and also denied motions for rehearing on remand. We affirm.
The instant case arose from petitioner’s dispute over its real property tax assessments for the tax years 1981, 1982 and 1983 on a 118-unit apartment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Antisdale v. City of GalesburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kern v. Pontiac TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Damon v. DeBarMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meadowlanes Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'n v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Meadowlanes Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'n v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1991