Legal Opinion

Seattle Audubon Society v. Moseley

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 2, 1992No. C92-479WDPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND INJUNCTION

DWYER, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

This order follows the order on cross-motions for summary judgment entered on May 28, 1992 (“May 28 order”) (Dkt. # 138). The present case is a sequel to Seattle Audubon Society v. Evans, 771 F.Supp. 1081 (W.D.Wash.1991), aff'd, 952 F.2d 297 (9th Cir.1991). The Evans decision required the United States Forest Service to adopt by March 5, 1992, revised standards and guidelines to ensure the viability of the northern spotted owl in national forests located in Forest Service Regions Five and Six. In this case plaintiffs Seattle…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
  2. Wilderness Society v. AlcockDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Sierra Club v. EspyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
  4. Northwest Forest Resource Council v. EspyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  5. Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Michael Dombeck, Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management, and Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API