Legal Opinion
Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Michigan Army National Guard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2017No. 17-3128PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Sutton, J.,
CLAY, J. (pp.' 182-83), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting from Part III of the majority opinion.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This dispute concerns the federal labor rights of National Guard technicians, who are covered by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (“FSLMRS”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7135, but who may be disciplined by the state Guard generally without federal review. During administrative proceedings related to the termination of two such technicians, the Michigan Army National Guard (the “Guard”) sent a letter to the 'employees’ union…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Turnbull Cone Baking Company of Tennessee v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Tracy D. Fisher v. F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary of the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrett v. Morgan County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Lacey v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023