Legal Opinion

Huther v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1956No. 411-52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This case comes before us on the Government’s first defense which is in effect a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that it does hot state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

By the terms of section 9 of the act of March 3, 1899, 30 Stat. 1151, 1 it was made necessary to obtain the consent of Congress before any bridge, dam, dike or causeway could be constructed over or in any navigable waters of the United States.

A short time after such enactment Canada wished to construct a dam partly in American waters. It could not proceed with such construction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
  3. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  4. Vansant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Yassin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Allan C. Miller and Betty G. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Langenegger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API