Huther v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
This case comes before us on the Government’s first defense which is in effect a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that it does hot state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
By the terms of section 9 of the act of March 3, 1899, 30 Stat. 1151, 1 it was made necessary to obtain the consent of Congress before any bridge, dam, dike or causeway could be constructed over or in any navigable waters of the United States.
A short time after such enactment Canada wished to construct a dam partly in American waters. It could not proceed with such construction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Vansant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Yassin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Allan C. Miller and Betty G. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Langenegger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984