Legal Opinion

Langenegger v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 14, 1984No. 108-81LPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.

This unusual case presents the question whether the United States must compensate American landowners for the loss suffered when their land is expropriated by a foreign government pursuant to its land reform program.

Facts

Plaintiffs are U.S. citizens each of whom owned an interest in Las Lahas, a large coffee plantation located in El Salvador. On October 15,1979, a group of Salvadoran military officers ousted the country’s existing government and established a “Revolutionary Junta of Government.” The Junta declared its intent to enact a program of economic,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Fred E. Langenegger, Steven W. Langenegger v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Coplin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Coastal Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API