Legal Opinion

Vansant v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 6, 1932No. 41825PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The material averments in the petition in substance are: That the plaintiffs are the owners of ten acres of land, *563known as Lorewood Grove, bordering on the south bank of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, and lying substantially between two parallel lines along two creeks or runs; that the mouths of the said two creeks were .each about 200 yards in width at their junction with the canal and extended back a distance of 1,000 feet; that the said mouths formed natural coves, bays, or basins, making a natural harbor for water craft; that at the time plaintiff acquired ownership of the said grove…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Columbia Basin Orchard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Noel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Llamera v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  5. Catalina Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API