Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2002No. S-02-115PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Jason S. Baker filed a motion to discharge alleging violation of his statutory right to a speedy trial. The Lincoln County District Court denied Baker’s motion, and he appeals.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

As a general rule, a trial court’s determination as to whether charges should be dismissed on speedy trial grounds is a factual question which will be affirmed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. State v. Recek, 263 Neb. 644, 641 N.W.2d 391 (2002).

To the extent an appeal calls for statutory interpretation or presents questions of law, an appellate court must reach an independent conclusion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OldfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BoslauNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WardNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. KinserNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. KnudtsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FeldhackerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. AldacoNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BanesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. CoveyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API