Legal Opinion

Brosnan v. Heinen's, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2017No. 105207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.:

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Robert Brosnan ("Brosnan"), appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Heinen's, Inc. ("Heinen's"), on Brosnan's claims for negligence and nuisance. Brosnan's wife, Mary Brosnan, appeals the derivative loss of consortium claim. We affirm.

I. Background and Facts

{¶ 2} On August 6, 2013, at approximately 10:15 a.m., 71-year-old Brosnan was walking toward the entrance of the Heinen's grocery store located in Bainbridge Township, Ohio ("store") when he tripped and fell over a raised portion of concrete…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. Verizon Cellular SalesOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API